Comparison Between Drinking Water and Normal Saline in Irrigating Traumatic Wound

ConditionTrauma
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorPatan Academy of Health Sciences

About this trial

There is a controversy regarding the roles of the Normal saline and Tap water in irrigation of the wound. It has been suggested that antiseptic solution including normal saline has cytotoxic effect while tap water damages the fibroblast. There are no high level evidence to support one type of solution over other, systematic review have found no difference in wound infection between irrigation with normal saline vs tap water. There are ten randomized controlled trial comparing tap water with normal saline for irrigating wound published between 1992 to 2016. These RCT are analyzed in three systemic review and meta-analysis published on 2016, 2019, 2022, which showed that tap water and normal saline has no difference in terms of infection rate. The infection rate observed in various studies ranges from 0-11.5% in normal saline group and 0-12.6% in tap water group with no statistically significant difference.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Laceration wound presenting within 6 hours of duration

Lacerations involving upper and lower limbs, scalps, head and neck

Disqualifiers

Lacerations involving, lips, ears, mucosal surface, perineal and peri anal region

Punctured or penetrating wound

Bite wounds by human or animals or snakes

Dirty wound requiring surgical debridement

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water

Treatment groups

440 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations