Comparison Between Exactech Guided Personalized Surgery (GPS) and Conventional Instrumentation of Shoulder Arthroplasty
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age21+
SponsorExactech
About this trial
The primary objective of this study is to examine the optimization of Reverse Shouder Arthroplasty implant position between GPS and conventional techniques. The secondary objective is to assess the effect of implant position using GPS vs. conventional techniques on ROM and patient reported outcomes. Long-term follow-up to 10 years with minimum 2 year follow-up for patients.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patient is at least 21 years of age at the time of surgery
Patient is indicated for reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Patient is willing to participate by complying with pre- and postoperative visit requirements
Patient is willing to participate for the entire length of the prescribed follow-up (minimum 2 years)
Disqualifiers
Revision shoulder arthroplasty
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture
Need for structural glenoid bone graft
Osteomyelitis of the proximal humerus or scapula; if a systemic infection or a secondary remote infection is suspected or confirmed, implantation should be delayed until infection is resolved
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Not listed
Trial groups
No trial groups listed
Sponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov