Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke

ConditionStrokes Thrombotic

Trial statusNot yet recruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age40-65

SponsorShalamar Institute of Health Sciences

About this trial

To compare the efficacy of CIMT and NDT among stroke patients To study the phenomena of transfer of training To study relationship between the MMSE score and stroke rehabilitation

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Participants will be aged 40-65 years and will have experienced either a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke with hemiplegic presentation within the past 1 to 6 months. Additionally, they must have a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 23.

Disqualifiers

Participants with visual or auditory deficits, musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders, mental impairments, or a history of surgery will be excluded from the study.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

Constraint-induced movement therapy
Neurodevelopmental Treatment

Treatment groups

10 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov