Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Dexmedotomidine in Lumber Spine Surgeries.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-50
SponsorAin Shams University

About this trial

Ultrasound (US) guided Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunchal fascial plane block technique was proposed in 2016. US guided ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of US guided ESPB versus (VS) intravenous Dexmedotomidine on postoperative analgesia and intra operative hemodynamic parameters in lumbar spine surgeries.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ESPB to intravenous Dexmedetomidine in patients who are undergoing elective lumber spine surgeries regarding the effect on postoperative analgesia and intra operative hemodynamic parameters.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

ASA I and II patients. aged 18 to 50 years. 70 to 80 kg.

Disqualifiers

patients under 18 years of age.

History of Allergic reactions to study drugs.

Opioid or analgesic abuse, and chronic treatment with opioids, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

History of bleeding tendency or coagulopathy

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ultrasound erector spinae plane block
  • dexamedotomidine infusion after induction of anesthesia

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators