COMPARISON OF AIRWAY NERVE BLOCK VERSUS NEBULIZED LIDOCAINE ON HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES DURING AWAKE FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorMayo Hospital Lahore

About this trial

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of airway nerve blocks versus nebulized lidocaine in attenuating hemodynamic responses during awake fiberoptic intubation in adult patients with anticipated difficult airways. Eighty patients undergoing elective surgery requiring awake fiberoptic intubation will be randomly assigned to receive either airway nerve blocks (glossopharyngeal and transtracheal blocks with lidocaine) or nebulized lidocaine. The primary outcome will be changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure during and after intubation. Secondary outcomes include intubation conditions, patient comfort, cough severity, intubation time, and procedure-related complications. The study aims to identify the most effective airway anesthesia technique for maintaining hemodynamic stability and improving patient tolerance during awake fiberoptic intubation.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nebulized Lidocaine
  • Nerve Block

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators