Comparison of Immediate Changes in Cervical Range of Motion Following Cervical Extension and Downslip Mobilizations.

ConditionCervical Disease

Trial statusRecruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age18-45

SponsorMissouri State University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy seated cervical extension glides vs supine downslip glides, on both cervical rotation range of motion and patient comfort. Information gathered from this study may be used to help clinicians determine the most beneficial methods of cervical mobilizations as a rehabilitation tool.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

healthy individuals

18-45 years of age.

Disqualifiers

current or previous history of neck pain;

cervical spine instability;

history of cervical spine surgery;

neurological issues;

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

Cervical Downslip Mobilization
Seated Cervical Extension Glide

Treatment groups

128 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Missouri State University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov