Comparison Of Implant Position Achieved With Fully Guided Versus Partially Guided Implant Placement

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorKrishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

About this trial

Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable, viable and successful option to replace missing teeth. Ample studies have shown excellent survival and clinical success rates of dental implants for various indications.The correct three-dimensional (3D) positioning of an implant is considered a prerequisite for an optimal outcome.Computer assisted implant surgery maybe beneficial in patients with limited bone and proximity to anatomic structures.Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIP(Computer Assisted Implant Placement) and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placement(cPGIP).

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients in need of replacement of missing teeth.

Mouth opening at least 30 mm.

Age>18 years.

Limited vertical or horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge.

Disqualifiers

Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day)

Uncontrolled diabetes

Metabolic bone disorders

History of radiotherapy of the head and neck

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • guided implant surgery

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations