Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSamsun University
About this trial
This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Adult patients aged 18 years and older
Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures
Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I-III
Patients undergoing general anesthesia
Disqualifiers
Patients younger than 18 years
Patients undergoing emergency surgery
Patients with anatomical abnormalities or surgical history involving the oropharynx, larynx, or airway
Patients with conditions contraindicating head or neck manipulation (e.g., cervical instability, upper airway tumors)
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Video Laryngoscope Intubation with Bougie
- Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM) Intubation with Bougie
Treatment groups
176 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov