Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorPeking University Third Hospital

About this trial

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 years

Disqualifiers

Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
  • Anatomic reconstruction operation
  • Open Modified Broström procedure

Treatment groups

114 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups