About this trial
This study focus on nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a cancer type with Chinese characteristics, analyze the early screening detection performance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the multi-cancer early screening model, and compare the performance differences among multi-omics models such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma-specific DNA methylation and fragmentome in the multi-cancer early screening model and the clinically routinely conducted Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nucleic acid quantification (EBV DNA) test and serological double antibody (double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA) test. It suggests that compared with EBV DNA quantification and double antibody tests, in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, multi-omics models such as DNA methylation can avoid false negatives, improve sensitivity, and increase the detection rate of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma; in patients without nasopharyngeal carcinoma, multi-omics models such as DNA methylation can avoid false positives, improve specificity, and avoid unnecessary over-diagnosis.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
40-74 years old
Clinically and/or pathologically diagnosed cancer
No prior or undergoing any systemic or local antitumor therapy, including but not limited to surgical resection, radiochemotherapy, endocrinotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, interventional therapy, etc.
Able to provide a written informed consent and willing to comply with all part of the protocol procedures
Disqualifiers
Pregnancy or lactating women
Known prior or current diagnosis of other types of malignancies comorbidities
Severe acute infection (e.g. severe or critical COVID-19, sepsis, etc.) or febrile illness (body temperature of ≥ 38.5 °C) within 14 days prior to screen
Recipients of organ transplant or prior bone marrow transplant or stem cell transplant
Trial population
Confirmed cancers or individuals without confirmed cancer will be invited to participate in this case-control study by a designated consenting professional.
Trial design
Case-control
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
False positive rate and false negative rate of ctDNA Methylation model, EBV DNA quantification test, double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA test
To analyze the early screening detection performance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the multi-cancer early screening model, and compare the false positive rate and false negative rate among in the multi-cancer early screening model and the clinically routinely conducted Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nucleic acid quantification (EBV DNA) test and serological double antibody (double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA) test.
Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA Methylation model, EBV DNA quantification test, double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA test in the Screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
To analyze the early screening detection performance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the multi-cancer early screening model, and compare the sensitivity and specificity among in the multi-cancer early screening model and the clinically routinely conducted Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nucleic acid quantification (EBV DNA) test and serological double antibody (double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA) test.
Secondary outcomes
Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA Methylation model, EBV DNA quantification test, double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA test in the detection of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma
To analyze the early screening detection performance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the multi-cancer early screening model, and compare the sensitivity and specificity among in the multi-cancer early screening model and the clinically routinely conducted Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nucleic acid quantification (EBV DNA) test and serological double antibody (double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA) test in the detection of stage I/II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Modeled positive and negative predictive values of ctDNA Methylation model, EBV DNA quantification test, double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA test
The difference in positive and negative predictive values was calculated combined with the incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and compared among in the multi-cancer early screening model and the clinically routinely conducted Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nucleic acid quantification (EBV DNA) test and serological double antibody (double antibodies of EBNA1-IgA and VCA-IgA) test.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Collaborator
Hainan People's Hospital
Collaborator
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Collaborator
First People's Hospital of Foshan
Collaborator
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
Collaborator
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Collaborator
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Collaborator
People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Collaborator