Comparison of Niel-Asher and Spencer Techniques in Frozen Shoulder Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age35-65
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques-Niel-Asher Technique and Spencer Technique-when combined with conventional physiotherapy in treating patients with frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis). Frozen shoulder is a painful condition that limits movement and function of the shoulder joint. The study will include 44 adults aged 35 to 65 years who have been diagnosed with stage II frozen shoulder. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive standard physiotherapy, including heat therapy, TENS, and stretching exercises. In addition, one group will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, while the other group will receive the Spencer Technique. Pain, range of motion, and shoulder function will be measured before and after a 4-week treatment period using validated tools such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a goniometer, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The goal is to determine which manual therapy technique is more effective in improving symptoms and function in patients with frozen shoulder.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age group between 35-65 years diagnosed with primary Adhesive Capsulitis.

Both gender male and female.

Both Active and passive Range of Motion is limited.

Stage II Frozen Shoulder patients (Freezing Stage,3-9 months).

Disqualifiers

Diabetes Mellitus, Thyroid disorders.

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Malignancy.

Rotator Cuff injury, Ligamentous Injuries.23

Previous Surgery or Manipulation under Anesthesia.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Niel-Asher Technique
  • Spencer Technique

Treatment groups

44 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups