Comparison of Orthodontic Molar Protraction With and Without Adjunctive Surgery

ConditionMalocclusion
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

About this trial

This study will compare orthodontic molar protraction with and without adjunctive periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontic (PAOO) surgery prior to orthodontic tooth movement.

To the investigators' knowledge, this type of molar retraction in adult patients has not been compared with and without the adjunctive use of PAOO for differences in clinical linear tooth movement and patient centered outcomes (discomfort, change in daily activities, satisfaction with esthetic outcomes) in a controlled study.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

English speaking

At least 18 years old

Must be a patient of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Dental School

Able to read and understand informed consent document

Disqualifiers

Non-English speaking

Less than 18 years old

Smokers/tobacco users (>10 cigarettes/day)

Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Orthodontic Molar Protraction and PAOO
  • Orthodontic Molar Protraction

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations