Comparison of Partial Rotator Cuff Repair vs. Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-89
SponsorUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

About this trial

The primary objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare pain and functional outcomes between two surgical modalities for irreparable rotator cuff tears as measured by the pain visual analog scale (VAS), simple shoulder test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery shoulder score (ASES), and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 score at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. The two surgical modalities of interest are partial rotator cuff repair alone and partial rotator cuff repair with superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). The secondary objective of this study is determine the failure rate of partial repair alone vs. partial repair with SCR via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months post-operatively. The information gained from this investigation will be useful to discern if SCR provides any benefit to patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. The investigators hypothesize that there is no statistically significant difference in pain and functional outcomes between partial rotator cuff repair alone versus partial rotator cuff repair with SCR. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that the failure rate will be significantly higher in patients undergoing partial rotator cuff repair with SCR.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age range: ≥18 years

Irreparable rotator cuff tear suspected on pre-operative MRI

Disqualifiers

Pregnant, illiterate, or non-English speaking individuals

Rotator cuff pathology amenable to a complete repair intraoperatively

Moderate to severe rotator cuff arthropathy (Hamada grade ≥3)

Presence of glenohumeral arthritis on radiographs

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Superior Capusular Reconstruction

    Procedure/Surgery

    Superior capsular reconstruction is one treatment option for massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears. The superior shoulder capsule, a thin membranous structure located on the inferior surface of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, is often torn in this type of rotator cuff tear. In superior capsular reconstruction, this structure is reconstructed with acellular dermal allograft.

  • Partial Rotator Cuff Repair

    Procedure/Surgery

    Partial rotator cuff repair can be performed, in conjunction with other procedures such as subacromial decompression and biceps tenodesis, when a rotator cuff tear is not amenable to a complete repair.

Treatment groups

105 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Superior Capsular ReconstructionActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Partial Rotator Cuff RepairPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Scale of 0 to 10; 0 is no pain, 10 is the most amount of pain

Time frame
6 weeks
2

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Scale of 0 to 10; 0 is no pain, 10 is the most amount of pain

Time frame
3 months
3

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Scale of 0 to 10; 0 is no pain, 10 is the most amount of pain

Time frame
6 months
4

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Scale of 0 to 10; 0 is no pain, 10 is the most amount of pain

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Graft/repair integrity via magnetic resonance imaging

Assessing the integrity of the repair, either SCR or the partial repair, to see if it is still intact at 12 months post-operatively.

Time frame
12-months post-operatively.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Lead sponsor

Lake Health

Collaborator

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush

Collaborator