Comparison of Pivotal Medial Polyethylene Versus Ultra-congruent in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-90
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
About this trial
The aim of this study is to compare the forgotten joint score for the medial pivot polyethylene and ultra-congruent polyethylene which are used in total prosthetic replacement of the knee
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Subjects 18 to 90 years of age, eligible for a primary total knee replacement for gonarthrosis
Competent subjects able to give informed consent to participate in the research
Affiliation to the social security system
Disqualifiers
Infection history of the knee to be replaced
Deformity greater than 15 degrees
Any surgical and/or anesthetic contraindication, or any condition deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the research.
Any contraindication mentioned in the instructions for use of the medical device
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot polyethylene
- total knee arthroplasty with ultra-congruent polyethylene
Treatment groups
90 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov