Comparison of Post-operation Cardiopulmonary Capacity of Patients Underwent Conventional and Robot-assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Valve Replacement Surgery

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age20+
SponsorTaichung Veterans General Hospital

About this trial

Robotic surgery is one of the most popular minimally invasive procedures for patients with coronary artery disease or valvular diseases. Studies have shown that, as compared to conventional sternotomy, patients underwent robot-assisted bypass grafting or valvuloplasty had less post-operation pain, blood transfusion volume during operation, re-operation rate, post-operation stroke rate and length of hospitalization. However, most studies focused on the comparison of complications of different procedures, and the investigation of cardiopulmonary function recovery is still lacking. Thus our study is to compare the functional outcomes between patients that undergo different surgical procedures.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

patient who undergo surgery for coronary artery bypass graft or valvular replacement.

Disqualifiers

pregnant

patients who receive more than one type of surgery

severe complications after surgery (ex. respiratory failure, stroke) and stayed in hospital for more than 2 weeks.

cannot perform the cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • robot-assisted surgery

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups