Comparison of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide &Amp; Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-45
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two therapeutic techniques-Cervical Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM)-in the treatment of mechanical neck pain. The trial seeks to determine which method is more effective in reducing pain, improving range of motion, and enhancing overall neck function in individuals suffering from mechanical neck pain.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

• Both genders (males and females)

Age between 20 and 45 years

History of neck pain >3 month, with tenderness on palpation present on sternocleidomastoid and Levator scapulae muscles and pain aggravated by activities involving turning head towards the side

Patients with pain on NPRS (at least 3)

Disqualifiers

• patients with recent injuries or surgeries in and around the neck region

Cervical nerve root lesion (radiculopathy)

Traumatic injuries like whiplash injury

malignancy in and around the neck region

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Cervical SNAGS (C3-C7) + Conventional PT
  • IASTM (ergon) + Conventional PT

Treatment groups

56 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups