Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
ConditionPelvic Organ Prolapse
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-75
SponsorHavva Betül Bacak
About this trial
This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, safety profiles, and patient satisfaction between two minimally invasive techniques for pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) mesh-free sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic mesh-free sacrocolpopexy. By evaluating perioperative data, complication rates, anatomical and functional outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether the V-NOTES approach provides comparable or superior results to the traditional laparoscopic technique, without the use of synthetic mesh.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patients who applied to Gaziosmanpaşa Education and Research Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, who underwent surgery due to symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with apical and anterior POP Q stage 2 and above, Being over 18 years old Patients who underwent surgery by experienced surgeons
Disqualifiers
Having previously received KT and/or RT due to any malignancy Having previously undergone surgery due to proplasus Patients with severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- V-NOTES Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy
- Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy
Treatment groups
52 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Havva Betül Bacak
Lead sponsor
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
Sponsor institution
Source ClinicalTrials.gov