Composite Plug Vs D-PTFE Membrane in Socket Preservation
ConditionAlveolar Bone Loss
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-70
SponsorCairo University
About this trial
The aim of the current study is to compare the effect socket sealing with flowable resin composite compared to dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane after filling the extraction site with xenograft particles in terms of soft and hard tissue changes, procedural time, post operative pain, patients' satisfaction, and cost effectiveness.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patients having single non-adjacent hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone that are indicated for extraction.
Patients with healthy systemic condition.
Patients aged from 20 to 70 years old.
Good oral hygiene.
Disqualifiers
Systemic diseases or medications that might affect bone metabolism, increase surgical risk or complicate post-operative healing.
Previous bone augmentation to implant site.
Untreated periodontal diseases.
Para-functional habits such as bruxism and clenching.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Socket preservation using xenograft and composite plug
- Socket preservation using xenograft and intentionally exposed d-PTFE
Treatment groups
20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov