Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Gartland Type II Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children - Which One ?

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age1-12
SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

The primary aim of this research is to compare the efficacy of conservative treatment versus surgical treatment for Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The comparison focuses on assessing differences in clinical outcomes functional recovery times, and complication rates between the two treatment groups.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients with Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures with age between 1-12 years old treated at the AUH

Disqualifiers

Gartland Type I, III, or IV fractures.

Open fractures.

Associated neurovascular injury (e.g., absent radial pulse, documented nerve palsy).

Patients with another injury in the same limb

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conservative treatment by casting
  • surgical treatment via percutaneous pinning UGA

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators