Continuous Cervical Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorNational Cheng-Kung University Hospital

About this trial

Shoulder arthroscopic surgery is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, which may hinder early mobilization and functional recovery. Interscalene block (ISB) is commonly used to provide effective analgesia but is frequently associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis due to phrenic nerve involvement. Cervical erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been proposed as an alternative regional technique that may provide analgesia while reducing respiratory-related adverse effects. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of cervical ESPB versus continuous ISB in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adult patients scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopic surgery

Disqualifiers

Contraindications to regional analgesia

BMI >40

ASA physical status IV

history of drug or opioid abuse

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Continuous Cervical Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Continuous Interscalene Block
  • No intervention

Treatment groups

165 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups