Alzheimer's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are the two main age-related neurodegenerative cognitive disorders. Differential diagnosis between these conditions is challenging, both at the prodromal and dementia stages. The lack of a precise diagnosis can be particularly harmful for patients with DLB, as up to 80% of them show severe adverse reactions to antipsychotic medications, including falls, confusion, and even death. The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease has improved with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers such as Tau, phosphorylated Tau (P-Tau), and the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (Lehmann et al., 2018). However, differentiating Alzheimer's disease from DLB remains difficult: 1 to 3 Alzheimer's biomarkers are frequently positive in the CSF of patients with DLB: in 49% of cases at the prodromal stage and up to 72% at the dementia stage. Moreover, total α-synuclein measurement in CSF has not proven to be diagnostically reliable. The DAT-scan, sometimes used as a supportive tool, is an expensive technique and lacks sensitivity, with detection rates of only 78% in dementia-stage DLB and 54% in prodromal DLB.
Given these limitations, identifying specific biomarkers for DLB, particularly pathological α-synuclein, is a critical objective. α-synuclein is the main protein component of Lewy bodies, whose abnormal β-sheet conformation promotes aggregation and prion-like propagation. Conventional measurements of total α-synuclein in CSF have failed to achieve sufficient diagnostic specificity. In contrast, detecting aggregated or pathological forms of α-synuclein in CSF appears to be a promising approach for improving the diagnosis of synucleinopathies. New techniques based on α-synuclein aggregation amplification have shown encouraging results in retrospective studies including neuropathologically confirmed cases (Bargar et al., 2021; Rossi et al., 2020). However, prospective evaluation of these methods in real-world clinical settings is still lacking. We hypothesize that a specific assay targeting pathological α-synuclein in CSF could reliably distinguish patients with DLB from those with Alzheimer's disease.
- Patient, male or female, age equal or over 50 with signs suggestive of one of the following conditions: Lewy body disease (LBD) according to the criteria of McKeith et al. 2017 and 2020, + positive DAT-scan at inclusion applying, if necessary, usual biomarkers such as polysomnography and MIBG scintigraphy. Patients with non-significant (0 or 1 out of 3) Alzheimer's disease LCS biomarkers (P-Tau, Tau, and Abeta42/40) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers (0 or 1 out of 3) will be considered as true MCL following lumbar puncture as part of the protocol.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) according to the criteria of Dubois et al. 2014, or
MCL + AD disease according to the criteria of McKeith et al. 2017 and 2020 + a positive DAT-scan at inclusion and Dubois et al. 2014, or
Fronto-temporal diseases (FTD) in the broad sense: taupathy or tardopathy: fronto-temporal lobar dementia (FTLD) according to the criteria of Rascovsky et al., 2011, or cortico-basal degeneration (CBD) according to the criteria of Amstrong et al., 2013, or supranuclear palsy according to the criteria of Höglinger et al., 2017, or age-related predominantly limbic TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE).
Patient with other neurological disease including, but not limited to, the following conditions: cerebral tumor, cerebrovascular accident with cognitive impairment, multisystem atrophy, etc, as judged by the investigator.
Patient with a contraindication to lumbar puncture.
Patient with a contraindication to cerebral MRI (patients included in Strasbourg only).
Any reason making it impossible to follow up the patient during the study period (planned move, etc.).