Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age7-12
SponsorMansoura University

About this trial

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness and patient acceptance of two orthodontic appliances-conventional palatal crib and bonded spurs-in the treatment of anterior open bite in children.Twenty children aged 7 to 12 years with anterior open bite and Class I skeletal and dental relationships will be randomly assigned to one of two groups The first group will receive a conventional palatal crib appliance fixed to the upper molars, while the second group will receive bonded spurs attached to the palatal surfaces of the upper incisors , All participants will be followed for 6 months. Clinical and digital measurements, including overbite ,The results of this study are expected to help determine which appliance provides better clinical outcomes and higher patient acceptance in the early treatment of anterior open bite.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Children aged 7 to 12 years

Skeletal Class I relationship

Angle Class I dental relationship

Dental anterior open bite ≥ 1 mm

Disqualifiers

Mouth breathing

Skeletal anterior open bite

Presence of posterior crossbite

Congenitally missing teeth

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional Palatal Crib
  • Bonded Spurs

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators