Coronary Computed Tomography Versus Invasive Angiography for Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorRigshospitalet, Denmark

About this trial

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a widely accepted initial diagnostic test for individuals suspected of having chronic coronary syndromes. However, there is limited evidence supporting its use in the acute setting. So far, no large-scale randomized trial has examined the performance of CCTA as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in individuals with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEACS).

If CCTA were to replace ICA as a routine procedure for individuals with NSTEACS, it could reduce the risk of complications related to ICA, improve patient comfort, expedite decision-making, and reduce healthcare expenses and interhospital transfers.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris and an indication for subacute ICA

Elevated troponin or ischemic electrocardiographic changes

Written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Instability requiring acute or emergent ICA

History of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting

Estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73m2

Probable type 2 acute myocardial infarction

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • CCTA
  • Conventional ICA
  • Team-based interventional triage

Treatment groups

2,300 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Lead sponsor

University of Copenhagen

Collaborator