About this trial
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare two restorative techniques for managing carious primary molars in children aged 6-9 years: the Hall Technique and conventional stainless-steel crown (SSC) placement. The study evaluates how each technique affects occlusal force distribution, mean bite force, and vertical dimension changes using the T-Scan digital occlusal analysis system. Additional outcomes include temporomandibular joint assessment, child discomfort levels, and parental satisfaction with treatment. Participants are allocated 1:1 to receive either the Hall Technique or conventional SSC restoration, and outcomes are measured at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 2- and 4-week follow-ups. The study aims to determine whether the minimally invasive Hall Technique provides comparable occlusal function and patient-centered outcomes when compared to traditional SSC preparation methods.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Systemically healthy children
Age ranging from 6 to 9 years
Cooperative behavior (positive rating on the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale)
Unrestored carious primary molar
Disqualifiers
Children with special health care needs
Temporomandibular disorders, bruxism or parafunctional habits
pathological facial swelling
periodontal diseases such as gingivitis, drug-induced gingival enlargement, juvenile or aggressive periodontitis
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Hall Technique Stainless Steel Crown Placement
- Conventional Stainless Steel Crown Placement
Treatment groups
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.