About this trial
The goal of this randomized questionnaire-based study is to evaluate how different presentations of artificial intelligence (AI) decision support influence clinical judgment among medical doctors working in obstetrics and gynecology when assessing the risk of spontaneous preterm birth using clinical case vignettes with cervical ultrasound images. The study specifically compares two AI presentation formats: a binary classification (preterm vs term birth) and an individualized risk estimate of preterm birth.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Which AI presentation format leads to better alignment between clinicians' confidence and decision accuracy (diagnostic calibration)? * Do different AI presentation formats lead to helpful or harmful changes in clinical decisions?
Participants will complete an online questionnaire in which they review clinical cases, make diagnostic and management decisions, rate their diagnostic confidence before and after seeing the AI output, and report their trust in the AI.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Medical doctors currently working in or training within the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
Experience performing transvaginal cervical ultrasound examinations.
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- AI prediction (binary)
- AI risk estimate (%)
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead sponsor
Technical University of Denmark
Collaborator
The Foundation of 17.12.1981
Collaborator
Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Collaborator
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Collaborator