Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) vs Standard Sizing Strategy TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age60+
SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

About this trial

To compare down sizing strategy versus annular sizing strategy technique (control group) in Type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expanding valves (SEVs): a randomized superiority trial

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 65 years;

Age <65 years and age ≥ 60 years with high surgical risk after combing STS Risk Estimate (≥ 8%), Katz activities of Daily Living, major Organ System Dysfunction and Procedure-Specific Impediment;

Severe, bicuspid aortic stenosis: Mean gradient ≥40 mmHg OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec OR Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2); if SVi <35mL/m2, low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography is required;

NYHA classification ≥ II;

Disqualifiers

Any contra-indication for Self-expanding bioprosthetic aortic valve deployment Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt< 50,000 cell/mL).

Active sepsis, including active bacterial endocarditis with or without treatment;

Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [(defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].

Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months (90 days) of the procedure.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • TAVR for BAV Using Down Sizing with the Evolut Pro platform
  • TAVR for BAV Using Traditional Sizing strategy with the Evolut Pro platform

Treatment groups

206 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups