Early Labor Pre-Marking for Epidural Analgesia: Ultrasound vs Manual Palpation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City (UMC)

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if finding and marking the best spot on the back early in labor helps doctors perform epidural pain relief more successfully in pregnant women. Usually, epidural pain relief is requested when labor pain is already severe, which makes it hard for women to hold still. This makes it difficult to find the right needle spot, leading to more needle attempts

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

* Does using ultrasound to mark the back early in labor (before severe pain starts) help the doctor place the needle correctly on first try without adjusting it? * Does this early marking method lower the number of needle attempts and the time it takes to finish the procedure? Researchers will compare marking the back using an ultrasound machine to the standard method of feeling the spine with hands. Both methods will be done early in the waiting room to avoid the challenges caused by severe pain. Importantly, neither the pregnant women nor the doctors performing the epidural will know which marking method was used. This design prevents personal beliefs or expectations from affecting the procedure, making the study results objective and trustworthy.

Participants will, if consented and participated in the study:

* Have their lower back examined and marked by a doctor early in labor using either an ultrasound machine or the doctor's hands. * Receive an epidural pain relief in the delivery room when they request it. This will be done by a different doctor who does not know how the back was marked. * Answer short questions about their pain level and how happy they are with the procedure.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Parturients aged 18 years and older, with gestational age at 37 weeks or older.

Actively requesting epidural analgesia for labor pain management without any contraindication to the procedure.

Disqualifiers

Parturients with spinal abnormalities or a history of spinal surgery.

Inability to visualize epidural landmarks under ultrasound imaging.

Parturients experiencing severe pain requiring immediate, emergent labor analgesia.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Preprocedural Spinal Ultrasound

    Procedure/Surgery

    A curvilinear probe is applied to the lower back in a transverse orientation. The vertebral midline is marked after identifying a symmetrical image in the transverse spinous process view. The probe is then oriented to obtain a paramedian sagittal laminar view. After locating the sacrum and lumbosacral junction, the probe is moved cephalad to identify and mark the L3 and L4 laminae. The probe is rotated back to a transverse view to systematically assess the lumbar interlaminar spaces, using the posterior complex (ligamentum flavum, epidural space, and posterior dura) and the anterior complex (anterior dura, posterior longitudinal ligament, and posterior vertebral body) as key landmarks. Markings are done with pen at four midpoints of the probe's edges in the L3-L4 space with the largest acoustic window. The intersection of horizontal and vertical lines drawn from these marks designates the needle insertion point.

  • Conventional Landmark Palpation

    Procedure/Surgery

    The anesthesiologist manually palpates anatomical landmarks to identify L3-L4 interspace and marks the midline insertion site. An ultrasound probe is then placed over this marked site only to measure skin-to-epidural depth for data collection purposes. These measurements are recorded but are not used to adjust or alter the marked insertion point.

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Ultrasound groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Landmark GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

First-pass success

Yes/No variable. First-pass success is defined as the successful identification of the epidural space during the initial forward advancement of the needle, without any needle redirection or withdrawal

Time frame
Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes

1

First-attempt success

Yes/No variable. First-attempt success is defined as the successful identification of the epidural space achieved with only a single skin puncture

Time frame
Periprocedural
2

Number of needle redirections

A needle redirection is defined as any partial withdrawal of the needle followed by a change in its advancement angle without the needle tip exiting the skin surface.

Time frame
Periprocedural
3

Number of needle attempts

A needle attempt is defined as a new skin puncture after the needle has been completely withdrawn.

Time frame
Periprocedural
4

Procedure time

Measured in seconds. Time from the moment the proceduralist inserts the Touhy needle at the marked position to final catheter fixation.

Time frame
Periprocedural

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.