Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Periodontitis Patients

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseEarly Phase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-40
SponsorMansoura University

About this trial

the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Therapy(MINST) compared to Conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy (CNST)

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

• Patients with stage III pericdontitis, according to the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) periodontal classification system .

Medically free patients.

Non-smokers

Patients with good oral hygiene.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or lactating females.

Patients with systemic diseases that might affect periodontal health

previous periodontal treatment within 6 months before baseline examination.

prior antibiotic regimen use within 1 month before baseline examination

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mechanical debridement .
  • minimally invasive mechanical debridement

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators