About this trial
This study explores the effects of single-dose losartan (50mg) versus placebo on social processing in healthy volunteers.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Willing and able to provide informed consent
Aged 18-50 years
Sufficient written and spoken English skills to understand what the study involves, and to complete the questionnaires
Non- or light-smoker (5 cigarettes a day, if vaping: less than 50 puffs)
Disqualifiers
Current DSM-5 axis-I diagnosis (based on SCID results at screening) or history of a severe psychological disorder such as psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, alcohol or substance abuse, or post-traumatic stress disorder
First-degree family member with severe psychiatric illness (including psychosis, bipolar disorder, unipolar psychotic depression).
CNS-medication last 6 weeks (including as part of another study)
Current blood pressure or other heart medication, including aliskiren and beta blockers)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Losartan potassium 50mg
DrugSingle dose losartan (50 mg), encapsulated identically to placebo.
Placebo
Other interventionSingle tablet encapsulated identically to placebo.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
AAT effect score
mean reaction time of the pull trials of a valence category subtracted from the push trials of the same category, yielding a single indicator of approach/avoidance, with positive scores indicating relatively stronger approach and negative scores indicating relatively stronger avoidance
Secondary outcomes
Sensitivity to Social Rejection
a) feelings of belonging, control, self-esteem, meaningful existence (on a scale from 1 to 5, with some items reverse coded) as measured on the reflexive and reflective needs-threat scale following Cyberball.
Social Learning
Social learning rate (early round versus late round investment decisions by generosity condition)
Interpretation Inflexibility
Within-person revision of biased interpretations: calculated by taking the average of differences between bias scores between stage 3/2 and 2/1. These two differences will be squared before averaging to reflect absolute change (i.e., in either direction), then the square root of the resulting average will be taken. Higher values mean more flexibility in revising prior interpretations.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of Oxford
Lead sponsor
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
Collaborator