Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

ConditionsContinuous Adductor Canal Block Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

Trial statusRecruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age21-65

SponsorAin Shams University

About this trial

This study aims to evaluate the effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block only versus adding posterior knee block, known as the Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block with Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) after arthroscopic knee surgeries.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age from 21 to 65 years.

Both sexes.

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I to II.

Patients with successful spinal anesthesia.

Disqualifiers

Declining to give written informed consent.

History of allergy to the medications used in the study.

Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and local infection).

Polytrauma patients having lower limb fractures.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

Continuous adductor canal block
Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule

Treatment groups

70 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Ain Shams University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov