Effect of Continuous Prolonged Prone Position Versus Intermittent Daily Prone Position in ARDS

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

About this trial

Prone position (placing the patient on his abdomen) has been shown to be an effective intervention to decrease mortality in adults connected to mechanical ventilation for moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Patients may require one or more sessions of prone position. However, the optimal duration of prone sessions is unknown. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if applying prone position in prolonged sessions (\> 48 hours - prolonged prone position) is more effective than applying it in daily sessions (16 to 24 hours - intermittent prone position). The trial will also learn about the safety of prolonged prone position compared to intermittent prone position. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does prolonged prone position increase survival compared to intermittent prone position in participants with moderate to severe ARDS ? * How does prolonged prone position compare to intermittent prone position in terms of medical problems associated to prone position ?

Researchers will compare prolonged versus intermittent prone position to see which approach is better to treat moderate to severe ARDS.

Participants will:

* Receive prone position either in prolonged (\> 48 hours) or daily (16 to 24 hours) sessions during the first 7 days * Be followed for up to 90 days to assess their clinical evolution

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours

Within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms

Bilateral infiltrates not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules

Disqualifiers

Contraindications for prone positioning such as intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg, massive hemoptysis, recent tracheal surgery or sternotomy or abdominal surgery with an open wound, recent facial trauma or facial surgery, unstable spine, femur, or pelvic fractures, or a single anterior chest tube with air leaks

Patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before randomization

Chronic respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (NIV)

Known pregnancy

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Daily prone position sessions
  • Prolonged prone position sessions

Treatment groups

780 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Lead sponsor

Hospital do Coracao

Collaborator

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

Collaborator

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile

Collaborator