Effects of Different Tunnel Methods in PICC Catheterization

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorSun Yat-sen University

About this trial

This prospective randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness and safety of one-needle and two-needle tunneling techniques for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement, aiming to identify the optimal tunneling method to reduce catheter-related complications.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Aged between 18 and 75 years old;

Educational level of primary school or above, with basic listening, speaking, reading and writing abilities, and capable of completing the questionnaire independently;

Receiving tunneled PICC catheterization for the first time, with 4Fr single-lumen solo PICC catheter indwelling;

Able to attend regular PICC maintenance at our hospital as scheduled after catheterization;

Disqualifiers

Patients with coagulation dysfunction (INR > 1.5 / PLT < 50×10⁹/L);

Pregnant or lactating women;

Patients with BMI < 18.5 kg/m²;

Patients receiving PICC catheterization via lower extremity veins;

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • One-needle tunnel technique
  • two-needle tunnel technique

Treatment groups

284 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators