About this trial
The pain experienced by participants after minimally invasive chest surgery (VATS) can make it difficult for them to take deep breaths, which can lead to problems with lung function. This can cause serious problems such as lung collapse, low oxygen levels, and infections, making recovery longer and more difficult. Managing pain well after surgery is important to prevent these problems and speed up recovery. In this study, we aimed to compare two pain relief methods, Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) and Paravertebral Block (PVB), in participants who underwent VATS. We will look at which method causes the smallest change in lung function before and after surgery.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Both genders
Being between the ages of 18 and 65
ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II-III
Body mass index between 19 and 30kg/m2
Disqualifiers
ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) IV-V
Patients who refuse to participate in the study
Patients under 18 years of age
Patients over 65 years of age
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP)
- Paravertebral Block (PVB)