Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorShandong University

About this trial

This was a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. The secondary outcomes included immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, procedure time, en bloc resection, complete histologic resection, use of haemostatic clips and perforation rate.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

18-80 years old, male and female

Proposed colonoscopy and colonoscopy detection of at least one 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyp

Disqualifiers

Contraindication to colonoscopy or polypectomy

Use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs within 1 week before polypectomy

Alarming signs and symptoms of colorectal cancer (blood in stool, black stool, unexplained anaemia and weight loss, abdominal mass, positive rectal examination; or imaging and laboratory tests highly suspicious for colorectal cancer) or endoscopic manifestations of polyps highly suspicious for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma

Comorbidity with inflammatory bowel disease, colonic polyposis, or active gastrointestinal bleeding

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • cold snare polypectomy
  • hot snare polypectomy

Treatment groups

196 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators