Ensuring Clinical Appropriateness and Safety of Pharmacological Therapies in Nursing Home Residents

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorLugano Istituti Sociali

About this trial

The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate whether a structured, clinical pharmacology team-led medication review improves the appropriateness and safety of medication prescribing in elderly nursing home (NH) residents. The study will also assess the impact of the intervention on indicators of inappropriate prescribing and resident-centred clinical outcomes. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1) Does a structured, digitally supported, medication review led by clinical pharmacologists reduce inappropriate medication prescribing, as measured by the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), in elderly NH residents? 2) Does the intervention reduce indicators of inappropriate prescribing, including potentially inappropriate prescriptions, therapeutic duplicates, drug-drug interactions and anticholinergic burden? 3) Does the intervention improve resident-centred clinical outcomes, such as falls, fractures, delirium, hyper-sedation, emergency department visits and hospitalizations? This is a single-arm, non-randomized, pre-post study conducted in seven NHs in Southern Switzerland. Each resident will serve as their own control, with outcomes compared between a 3-month pre-intervention period and a 3-month post-intervention period.

The intervention consists of: 1) An individualized, digitally supported, medication review conducted by the team of clinical pharmacologists; 2) Face-to-face feedback to NH healthcare professionals responsible for managing residents' medications; 3) Tailored educational sessions addressing common prescribing issues identified during the medication review.

Participants will: be aged 65 years or older and reside in participating NHs; have their routinely collected clinical and medication data assessed during a 3-month pre-intervention period; receive the intervention integrated into routine care, with any medication changes implemented by treating clinicians.

The study is low-risk, non-invasive, and embedded in routine NH care. The results will provide evidence on the clinical effectiveness of integrating clinical pharmacology expertise into inter-professional medication management in Swiss NHs.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Expected to remain in the nursing home for the duration of the study

Able to provide informed consent or having a legally authorized representative able to provide consent if the resident lacks capacity

Disqualifiers

Residents in their probable last hours or days of life

Residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment (Cognitive Performance Scale, CPS, score >4

Residents housed in assisted nursing home wards, including those requiring palliative care (either in dedicated palliative units or receiving palliative care in general wards), those in the hemodialysis unit, and those with severe obesity (body mass index >=40kg/m2)

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Multi-Component Intervention on Medication Prescribing

    Procedure/Surgery

    The study intervention is a multi-component procedure led by a team of clinical pharmacologists to improve medication prescribing among nursing home residents. It includes: 1) individualized medication review with a comprehensive review of each resident's medications, digitally supported; the assessment of medication prescribing appropriateness using the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), the identification of key indicators of inappropriate prescribing and the assessment of resident-centred clinical outcomes; 2) face-to-face feedback with nursing home healthcare professionals responsible for managing residents' medications to discuss recommended adjustments for each resident, fostering inter-professional collaboration; 3) tailored educational sessions to nursing home healthcare professionals responsible for managing residents' medications, addressing common prescribing issues identified during medication review. No drugs or medical devices will be used during this procedure.

Treatment groups

219 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Appropriateness of medication prescribingExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)

Reduction in the total MAI score per resident between pre-intervention (day 1) and post-intervention (day 180) periods. The MAI is calculated at the medication level for each long-term in-use medication (\>=3 months, excluding as needed medications), using a modified 10-item MAI scoring system. Each medication is scored from 0 to 17 (higher score=greater inappropriateness). A resident-level MAI is calculated by summing the MAI scores of all eligible medications.

Time frame
Pre-intervention (day 1) and post-intervention (day 180), for comparison

Secondary outcomes

1

Indicator of inappropriate prescribing: potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs)

Frequency of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs), identified according to the American Geriatrics Society Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults (2023). This indicator will be determined for each participant based on the individual medication list.

Time frame
Pre-intervention (day 1) and post-intervention (day 180), for comparison
2

Indicator of inappropriate prescribing: therapeutic duplicates (TDs)

Frequency of therapeutic duplicates (TDs), defined as the concurrent prescription of two or more drugs within the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) subgroup at the fourth level. This indicator will be determined for each participant based on the individual medication list.

Time frame
Pre-intervention (day 1) and post-intervention (day 180), for comparison
3

Indicator of inappropriate prescribing: drug-drug interactions (DDIs)

Frequency of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), assessed by clinical pharmacologists through consultation of Lexicomp (external drug interaction database). This indicator will be determined for each participant based on the individual medication list.

Time frame
Pre-intervention (day 1) and post-intervention (day 180), for comparison
4

Indicator of inappropriate prescribing: anticholinergic burden (ACB)

Frequency of anticholinergic burden (ACB), evaluated by clinical clinical pharmacologists according to the ACB scale 2012. This indicator will be determined for each participant based on the individual medication list.

Time frame
Pre-intervention (day 1) and post-intervention (day 180), for comparison

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Lugano Istituti Sociali

Lead sponsor

Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ticino, Switzerland

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: