About this trial
This pilot study is aimed to compare and assess the impact, safety, and practical utility of gastric versus postpyloric feeding in moderate to severe ARDS patients with prone position ventilation. Patients included will be randomly assigned to receive enteral nutrition either through a nasogastric tube or a nasojejunal tube. The primary endpoint is the achievement of enteral nutrition goals. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of hospital-acquired infections, the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, 60-day mortality rates, the incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance, and the rate of enteral nutrition intake.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
ARDS patients who meet the Berlin criteria for ARDS and have a P/F ratio ≤ 200mmHg.
Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and clinically judged to require prone ventilation, with an anticipated daily prone positioning time of ≥12 hours and a duration of prone ventilation therapy of ≥3 days.
Patients planned to receive enteral nutrition.
Age ≥18 and ≤85 years.
Disqualifiers
Contraindications to enteral nutrition, such as severe intestinal ischemia, active upper gastrointestinal bleeding, high-output intestinal fistula without a distal feeding route, abdominal compartment syndrome, severe diarrhea, intestinal obstruction, etc.
Presence of shock with hemodynamic instability (norepinephrine or equivalent vasopressor dosage ≥0.5ug/kg.min) or tissue hypoperfusion (lactate >3mmol/L).
Life-threatening hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and acidosis.
Inability to tolerate prone ventilation (e.g., pregnant women, limb contractures, recent fractures, recent thoracic or abdominal surgery, pacemaker insertion within 48 hours, spinal instability, pelvic fractures, facial fractures, anticipated difficult airway).
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- enteral nutrition through nasojejunal tube
- enteral nutrition through nasogastric tube