ESPBs vs TAPs for Satisfactory Analgesia Following DIEP Surgery

ConditionPain
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-70
SponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical Center

About this trial

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in American women . For patients who have undergone surgical mastectomy, autologous breast reconstruction is an alternative option to breast implants. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flaps are the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction . Effective pain control following surgery is imperative and ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane blocks (TAPs) with the infiltration of local anesthetics, such a ropivacaine are a common regional technique of choice . A newer described technique, bilateral Erector Spinae Plane blocks (ESPBs) (which also are an infiltration of local anesthetic) present as an alternative approach for post-operative analgesia. ESPBs have been proven efficacious in reducing intra- and post-operative opioid requirements, lessening the need for rescue analgesics in other similar surgical procedures.

The hypothesis is that preoperative bilateral ESPBs could provide equivalent pain control as a regional analgesic for patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery when compared to preoperative bilateral TAPs

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adult women with breast cancer, ASA 1-3, undergoing DIEP flap surgery

Disqualifiers

Chronic opioid use contraindications to local anesthetics or regional analgesia Inability to communicate intensity of pain on a numeric analog scale

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pre-operative Erector Spinae Plane block prior to DIEP surgery
  • Pre-operative Transversus Abdominus Plane blocks prior to DIEP surgery

Treatment groups

102 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups