ESWL vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study

ConditionStone Ureter
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

This comparison between ESWL and flexible ureteroscopy aims to explore the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of these treatments for upper ureteric stones under 15 mm, focusing on stone-free rates, procedural risks, recovery times, and recurrence rates. A thorough understanding of these techniques is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and personalizing treatment strategies.

study aim to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cost of SWL compared to flexible uretroscopy in management patients with upper ureteric stone less than 15 mm in size

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

patients age>18 years old. Stone site: upper ureteric stone. Stone side: unilateral stones Stone size: stones diameter up to 1cm Stone number: single or multiple Radio-opaque stone

Disqualifiers

patients with solitary kidney or only function kidney renal impairment present of distal obstruction pregnancy, current breast feeding. Bleeding tendency or anticoagulation. ipsilateral ureterolithiasis, Acute or chronic nephritis, or Renal tuberculosis aneurysm of the aorta or renal artery. inability to position the patient on the SWL table (eg, due to severe skeletal deformity or morbid obesity).

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • shock wave lithotripsy
  • Flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy

Treatment groups

42 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators