Evaluation of 3D-printed Space Maintainers Versus Conventional Space Maintainer : a Randomized Clinical Trial

ConditionTooth Loss
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age4-8
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

This study aims to compare the clinical evaluation and patients' satisfaction of space maintainers produced by digital workflow using the 3D-printing method (3D-SMs) versus conventional band and loop space maintainers (C-SMs) produced by traditional methods.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Lower first permanent molar in active state of eruption

Patient and parent showing cooperation and compliance.

Medically free children.

According to space analysis available space is less than or equal to needed space

Disqualifiers

Children with previous allergies to stainless steel.

There was less than one year left for the permanent tooth to erupt (to prevent possible abutment toot loss)

The patient's oral hygiene is not sufficient and has periodontal problems (to accurately assess the periodontal effects)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • 3D printed space maintainer
  • Conventional space maintainer

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators