EVALUATION OF A FULLY AUTOMATED AI TOOL FOR EMBRYO RANKING
ConditionPregnancy
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-42
SponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
About this trial
This study aims to investigate whether embryo ranking by a fully automated AI tool (iDAScore) results in a similar transfer-to-pregnancy compared to manual embryo ranking by an embryologist. IVF patients who are planned for a freeze-all approach (where all usable embryos are frozen and transferred in later transfer cycles) will be allocated to either the control (ranking by embryologist) or intervention arm (ranking by iDAScore). The frozen embryos will be warmed and transferred one by one, according to their assigned rank. We want to see if the average number of embryo transfers that is needed to achieve a clinical pregnancy (transfer-to-pregnancy) is similar in both groups.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
patients undergoing an ICSI/IVF treatment (with donor or own oocytes) that are planned for a 'freeze-all' strategy on day 5
all types of sperm samples (ejaculated or testicular, fresh or frozen, partner or donor origin)
Minimum 8 follicles (≥ 12 mm) on last follicular measurement before oocyte retrieval
18 ≤ Age ≤ 42 years
Disqualifiers
Embassy patients
Use of frozen oocytes
In vitro maturation (IVM) cycles
Pre-implantation genetic Testing (PGT) cycles
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- AI algorithm
Treatment groups
1,325 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov