Exergame and Robotic Therapy Impact on Tenascin-C and Functional Outcome on Stroke Patients
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorHasanuddin University
About this trial
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Robotic versus Exergame versus Standard therapy to improve hand function among post-stroke patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1, Effectiveness of interventions in functional outcome recovery across time 2. Effectiveness of interventions in affecting Tenascin-C level 3. Clinical outcome difference between all interventions
Participants will be allocated into three groups, either a robotic group, exergame group as the main interventions, and standard rehabilitation group as the active comparator. A serial follow-up will be conducted to assess the selected clinical outcome and differences in outcome
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patients after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
stable hemodynamics and neurologic state.
Patients have never undergone treatment with any intervention
Able to watch television with or without glasses from a distance of 1 meter.
Disqualifiers
Patients with a history of seizures or epilepsy.
Patients with severe cognitive disorders that can interfere with research objectives (MMSE score <24).
Patients with field deficits or severe vision disorders.
The patient is unable to sit upright without help.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Exergame
- Robotic
- Conventional
Treatment groups
48 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov