About this trial
The goal of this pilot randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the - specifically to the prison context adapted - World Health Organization's Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention for individuals detained in Dutch remand prisons. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
* To what extent is the contextually adapted PM+ intervention feasible and acceptable for individuals detained in Dutch remand prisons? * To what extent are there preliminary indications of pre to post-effects of the PM+ intervention on, for example, anxiety and depression symptoms?
Researchers will compare two groups to answer these questions. Participants will either receive the PM+ intervention and Care-as-Usual or only Care-as-Usual.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
18 years old or above;
Imprisoned in a Dutch prison;
Held on remand;
Dutch-speaking;
Disqualifiers
Enclosed in a penitentiary psychiatric centre;
Presents a potential security risk to the research team (PM+ helper and/or research team)
Acute medical condition;
Imminent suicide risk or expressed acute needs/protection risks (e.g., someone who expresses that they are at acute risk of being assaulted or killed);
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Problem Management Plus (PM+)
BehavioralProblem Management Plus (PM+) is a brief, psychological intervention program based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques that are empirically supported and formally recommended by the WHO (Dua et al., 2011; Tol et al., 2013). The full protocol was developed by the WHO and the University of New South Wales, Australia. The manual involves the following empirically supported elements: problem-solving, stress management, behavioural activation, and accessing social support. PM+ has three core features. It is brief (five sessions given in five weeks), delivered by paraprofessionals (PM+ helpers) and transdiagnostic. The PM+ helpers will be supervised by mental health care specialists.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Feasibility and acceptability of PM+
Factors relevant to the study of this outcome are: 1. PM+ fidelity; 2. The perceptions about PM+ from RCT participants, helpers, supervisors, trainers, professionals, and family members \& friends of RCT participants; 3. Indicators of intervention delivery, such as implementation process, adaptation, and dose. 4. Retention rate PM+ sessions; and 5. Recruitment and the consent rates.
Secondary outcomes
Preliminary indications of pre to post-effects on symptoms of depression and anxiety
Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ9, depression) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7, anxiety). A higher score on the PHQ9 (range = 1 - 27) means a greater severity of depressive symptoms. A higher score on the GAD-7 (range = 0 - 21) means a greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Preliminary indications of pre to post-effects on self-identified problems
Measured by Psychological Outcome Profiles (PSYCHLOPS, self-identified problems). A higher score on the PSYCHLOPS (range = 0 - 20) means a greater severity of self-identified problems.
Preliminary indications of pre to post-effects on quality of life
Measured by World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale - brief (WHOQOL-BREF, quality of life). The score range differs per domain, but a higher score on every domain means a higher perceived quality of life. Domain I: 7 - 35. Domain II: 6 - 30. Domain III: 3 - 15. Domain IV: 8 - 40. Facet Overall Quality of Life and Health 2-10.
Preliminary indications of pre to post-effects on trauma
Measured by Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist DSM5 (PCL-5, PTSD symptoms). A higher score on the PCL-5 (range = 0 - 80) means a greater severity of PTSD symptoms.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
VU University of Amsterdam
Lead sponsor
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR)
Collaborator