Feasibility of an Enhanced Symptom Monitoring and Expedited Subspecialty Care Referral Intervention to Improve Side Effect Management for Patients With Melanoma Receiving an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

ConditionMelanoma
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorOHSU Knight Cancer Institute

About this trial

This clinical trial tests the feasibility of patient reported outcomes monitoring with early, rapid immunotherapy toxicity subspecialty care to improve side effect management for patients with melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma, but their use is frequently complicated by immune related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs can affect any organ system, range in severity from mild to life threatening, and often require a pause or stopping of immunotherapy treatment. Early identification and management of irAEs may reduce progression to severe toxicity. Electronic patient self reporting of symptoms with ways to support early involvement of non oncology subspecialists may be a feasible way to improve side effect management for patients with melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

PATIENT: Age 18 years or older

PATIENT: Histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma

PATIENT: Plan to begin a standard of care (SOC) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for the treatment of melanoma per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and/or National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines

PATIENT: Willing and able to provide informed consent

Disqualifiers

PATIENT: Previously received ICI therapy

PATIENT: Life expectancy of < 6 months at time of enrollment

PATIENT: Concurrently receiving a non-ICI systemic therapy

PATIENT: Concurrently receiving radiation, unless hypofractionated palliative radiation prescribed to alleviate poorly controlled symptoms (e.g., pain)

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Electronic Health Record Review

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Internet-Based Intervention

    Other intervention

    Receive access to ePRO tool

  • Patient Navigation

    Behavioral

    Receive review of symptoms and referral if needed

  • Survey Administration

    Other intervention

    Complete ePRO assessments

  • Survey Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Supportive care (ePRO monitoring and referrals)Experimental treatment 4 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of eligible patients who consent to the study and begin the intervention (feasibility of study enrollment)

Will estimate the proportion of patients enrolled with 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame
At enrollment
2

Proportion of patients evaluated by subspecialists in ≤ 14 days among participants who enrolled and developed a suspected immune related adverse events (irAE) (grade 2 or higher) (feasibility of intervention delivery)

Time frame
From baseline to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of patients who complete data collection at 6 months (retention)

Will estimate the proportion of patients retained in the study and adherent to electronic patient reported outcomes with 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame
At month 6
2

Proportion of weeks a Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire was completed out of the number of weeks since starting the intervention (ePRO adherence)

Time frame
From baseline to 6 months
3

Proportion of participants rating the study as acceptable (acceptability)

Assessed via adapted from Basch et al's survey. Acceptability is defined as a mean summary score of 3 or higher.

Time frame
At 6 months
4

Proportion of caregivers for enrolled participants rate the study as acceptable (acceptability)

Assessed via adapted from Basch et al's survey. Acceptability is defined as a mean summary score of 3 or higher.

Time frame
At 6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: