About this trial
Intubation is a common procedure in the intensive care unit. Hypoxemia is the most frequent complication of this procedure.
Monitoring the end-tidal of oxygen is recommended in operating room (OR). End-tidal of oxygen (EtO2) \>90% is an indication of a correct preoxygenation.
This monitoring is not used in routine in intensive care unit (ICU). There is no recommendation on the monitoring of end-tidal of oxygen in intensive care unit. In practice, clinicians use pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) to determine whether the patient is sufficiently preoxygenated. However, this parameter is not a good indicator of a correct preoxygenation.
In the OR, patients are compliant during the preoxygenation period and the measure of EtO2 with the face mask monitor is considered reliable because i) mask leakage is minimal and ii) the patient can breathe slowly and regularly.
Theses conditions are not available in critical ill patients requiring emergency intubation. EtO2 measured on the facemask may not reflect true EtO2.
This concern about the reliability of EtO2 measurement via the facemask justifies that we conduct a study to compare EtO2 measured on a facemask (facemask EtO2) to EtO2 measured in pharynx (via e nasopharyngeal catheter).
The aim of this study is to determine whether the measurement of EtO2 on facemask is reliable in patients in ICU.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Age ≥ 18 years
Requiring an intubation in ICU for acute respiratory failure defined as a respiratory rate ≥ 25/min or clinical signs of respiratory distress or hypoxemia defined as oxygen requirement ≥ 15L/min or FiO2 ≥80% to maintain SpO2 ≥92% or a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <100 mmHg
With preoxygenation by noninvasive ventilation
Disqualifiers
Intubation for cardiac arrest
EtO2 monitoring not available
Pulsed oxygen saturation monitoring specific for the study not available
Preoxygenation by high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or bag-mask ventilation
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- double monitoring of EtO2