General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in RIRS

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSouth Valley University

About this trial

The impact of anesthesia type on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate. Several studies have compared general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in endourological procedures, with conflicting results regarding operative time, complication rates, and stone-free outcomes. Importantly, the interaction between anesthesia type and stone characteristics-particularly stone size-has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of general versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing RIRS at Qena University Hospital, with particular emphasis on the effect of stone size stratification on perioperative outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective RIRS for renal stones <2 cm.

Written informed consent obtained.

Disqualifiers

History of previous ureteral surgery or known ureteral stricture.

Multiple or bilateral renal stones requiring staged procedures.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Not listed

Trial groups

80 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups

Sponsors and collaborators