Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age8-15
SponsorTishreen University

About this trial

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns placed using the Hall Technique versus the conventional method in the restoration of permanent first molars in children, and to evaluate their effects on occlusal relationships, crown adaptation, and patient satisfaction.

Study Outcomes The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns placed on permanent first molars using the Hall Technique in comparison to the conventional crown placement method. The secondary outcomes included assessment of the marginal fit and adaptation of preformed crowns using both techniques, analysis of changes in occlusal relationships-specifically the vertical dimension of occlusion and overbite-and evaluation of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale at multiple time points: immediately post-treatment, and at one, three, and six months.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

No signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis

Molars with carious lesions affecting two or more surfaces

Permanent first molars with developmental defects

First molars with an intact dentin layer visible radiographically

Disqualifiers

Patients with known nickel allergy

Severely damaged molars not restorable with preformed crowns

First molars without opposing teeth

Pulp exposure during caries excavation

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Stainless steel crown placement using Hall Technique
  • Stainless steel crown placement using conventional method

Treatment groups

10 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators