HVLAT, Electric DN, Exercise Vs. Mobilization, STM, Exercise, TENS for Tension Type Headaches

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorAlabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

About this trial

The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with tension-type headaches: thrust Manipulation, electric dry Needling and exercise Vs. non-thrust mobilization, soft-tissue mobilization, exercise and TENS. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat tension-type headaches. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

At least 10 episodes of headache occurring on 1- 14 days per month on average for >3 months (12 and <180 days per year)

Headache lasting from 30 minutes to 7 days

Bilateral location

Pressing or tightening (non-pulsating) quality

Disqualifiers

Patient presents with other primary and/or secondary headache

Headache occurring on 15 days per month in a patient with a pre-existing headache disorder

Regular overuse for >3 months of one of more drug that can be taken for acute and/or symptomatic treatment of headache

Not better accounted for by another headache diagnosis

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Thrust Manipulation, Electric Dry Needling and Exercise
  • Non-thrust Mobilization, Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Exercise and TENS

Treatment groups

110 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

Lead sponsor

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Collaborator