Immediate vs Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement
ConditionDental Implant
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Belgrade
About this trial
The goal of this study is to assess clinical, radiological and patient centred outcomes of immediate and conventional implant loading protocols, and to compare clinical outcomes of these two different loading protocols (immediate and conventional) in combination with early implant placement of single implants in the esthetic zone of maxilla.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Single failing tooth in the esthetic zone of maxilla (second premolar to second premolar)
Patients older than 18 years
Healthy patients ASA I and II
Non-smokers/Light smokers (<10 cigarettes per day)
Disqualifiers
Implants adjacent to the failing teeth
Active periodontal infection
Severe bruxism
Systemic or local conditions that contraindicates dental implant surgery - Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day)
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Early implant placement with immediate provisional restoration
- Early implant placement with delayed loading
Treatment groups
50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
University of Belgrade
Lead sponsor
ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland
Collaborator
Source ClinicalTrials.gov