Impact OF Cooled Versus Thermal Radiofrequency Denervation In Management Of Chronic Lumber Facet Joint Pain

Chronic lumber facet joint pain is defined according to international association of study of pain (IASP)as multifactorial phenomenon of pain that persist more than 3 months after an injury and /or beyond the usual course of an acute lumber facet pain or a reasonable time for a comparable injury to heal .

lumber facet joint degeneration (LRFJ) is the 1st source of chronic low back pain with an incidence of 15% t o 45 % among patients with low back pain . the spinal facet joint has an abundant nerve supply ; therefore, pain can be caused by arthritic change, degenerative change, inflammation, and injury .

Degeneration of all LFJs (lumbar facet joints) was diagnosed using magnetic resonance image (MRI) , the most sensitive and diagnostic tool. Thus, hypertrophy, degeneration, and the accumulation of fluid within the joints are signs of LFJ degeneration it was found in all treated LFJs .

facet joint pain management can be achieved using medical therapy or facet joint therapeutic interventions, ultrasound guided injection,or fluoroscopically guided facet joint injection (FJI) , medial branch block (MBB) , or radiofrequency ablation .

Radiofrequency is a minimally invasive procedure and is operated under light

intravenous sedation or local anesthesia when necessary. Radiofrequency

energy is delivered to the target nerves through an insulated needle , and this

energy heats and denatures the nerve for the purpose of pain relief . The

radiofrequency techniques include, thermal, and cooled radiofrequency .

thermal radiofrequency (TRFA) uses more energy and higher temperature compared

with cooled radiofrequency , cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is a

newer technique, and may have some theoretical advantages over traditional

radiofrequency whereas , cooled radiofrequency adopts internally probes to

increase lesion size , and it can increase the chance of complete denervation .

based on heat neurotomy (60°C (celsius) vs. 80°C in TRFA) with the resulting ablative area twice as long and extending distally from the tip of the electrode.