Impact of Finishing/Polishing Systems on Ormocer VS Methacrylate Based Bulk Fill Flowable Composite in Class V

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-35
SponsorMansoura University

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare. Impact of finishing/polishing systems on ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations: The main question it aims to answer is the following:

Are there any differences between finishing/polishing systems on Ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite?

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Three pairs of buccal cervical supragingival carious lesions in anterior teeth

Complete and normal occlusion

Good oral hygiene

Willingness to attend follow-up and recall visits for 2 years

Disqualifiers

Teeth requiring direct pulp capping

Poor oral hygiene or failure to complete the oral hygiene phase

Chronic periodontitis

Pulpitis or non-vital teeth

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • one-step finishing and polishing system.
  • two-step finishing and polishing system.
  • three-step finishing and polishing system.

Treatment groups

25 Participants
are divided into 6 treatment groups

6

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Sponsors and collaborators